Clinical characteristics and mid-term follow-up of elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis not eligible for TAVI

BACKGROUND: The treatment for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) is the correction of valve stenosis by surgical valve replacement and more recently by transcatheter aortic valve implant (TAVI). However, in some high risk surgical patients, TAVI is not possible for technical or clinical reasons or due to the unavailability of the endoprosthesis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate a mid-term follow-up of symptomatic severe AS patients who are not eligible for TAVI trials, as well as to identify the clinical features of these patients. METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective study conducted with 475 symptomatic severe AS patients, evaluated by the Heart Team between 2000 and 2017. Inclusion criterias were: patients considered not to be eligible for TAVI. The Shapiro-Wilk test was applied to evaluate normality. Non-paired t and Mann-Whitney tests were applied for continuous variables, while the chi-squared and Fischer exact tests were applied for categorical variables, with a level of significance of p<0,05. RESULTS: The heart team evaluated 475 patients: 25 (5.26%) died before any intervention could be proposed; 326 (68.3%) were submitted to TAVI, so the study population consisted of 124 patients not eligible for TAVI. Of these, 31 (25%) underwent surgery and 93 (75%) remained in clinical treatment. In a mean 56 months- follow-up the mortality in clinical group was 46.2%. In the surgical group the mortality was 23.9% (in-hospital 12.9% and late mortality 11% in a mean 47.4 months follow-up). The patients that died presented a significantly lower left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF), a smaller valve area, and a larger end-systolic diameter of the LV. CONCLUSION: The mortality of the clinical group's patients was significantly higher than the surgical mortality (46.2% vs. 12.9%; p=0.021). The patients of the clinical group were older, weighed less, and had a higher incidence of renal failure and a higher STS score.

Desproporción prótesis-paciente luego de reemplazo de válvula aórtica y seguimiento a 6 años / Patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement: a 6 year follow up

Resumen: Introducción: La desproporción prótesis-paciente (DPP) tras cirugía valvular ocurre cuando el área efectiva de orificio protésico (AEO) es fisiológicamente demasiado pequeño en relación con el tamaño del paciente, lo que resulta en gradientes postoperatorios elevados. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional retrospectivo. Se analizaron pacientes con estenosis aórtica sometidos a reemplazo de válvula aórtica durante el año 2010. Se calculó AEO/ASC postoperatorio, si AEO/ASC fue menor de 0,85 cm2/ m2 el paciente fue clasificado como desproporción prótesis-paciente. Los eventos clínicos analizados fueron: mortalidad por cualquier causa, recambio valvular, internación por insuficiencia cardiaca y la capacidad funcional al momento de la encuesta. Se realizaron estadísticas descriptivas para analizar las características de la población. Las variables categóricas se expresaron en porcentaje y las variables continuas en promedio y desviación estándar. El análisis estadístico se realizó con el software IBM® SPSS® 19. Resultados: Se analizaron 26 pacientes sometidos a reemplazo de válvula aórtica con un seguimiento a 6 años, 13 de ellos presentaron DPP y mayor porcentaje de disnea, internación por insuficiencia cardiaca y muerte por cualquier causa. La combinación de eventos clínicos en este grupo de pacientes fue del 53,9%. Conclusión: Se observó un mayor número de eventos cardiovasculares en aquellos pacientes que con des- proporción prótesis-paciente.

Abstract: Background: Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) after aortic valve replacement is related to inferior long-term outcomes. The study aim was to describe the rate of cardiovascular events in patients with or without PPM. Methods: The study was based on a retrospective analysis of information obtained from the electronic medical record. All patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, with or without revascularization surgery during 2010 were included. The effective orifice area (EOA) of the prothesis was obtained based on prosthetic valve data from echocardiography recommendations, was related to body surface area (BSA). PPM was diagnosed when EOA / BSA was < 0.85 cm2/m2. Clinical results were evaluated in January 2017 through our electronic medical record data base and a telephone interview. Helsinki criteria for clinical research were respected. Results: 26 patients were analyzed (20 males) with mean age 64 (SD 11.5) years old. A mechanical prosthesis was implanted in 10 patients and a biological one in the remaining subjects. 13 patients had DPP (EOA/BSA 0.77 ± 0.06). At a mean follow up period of 2190 days 44% were in functional class (NYHA) II-III, 31% had been re-hospitalized for heart failure and 8% had died from cardiac causes (overall death rate 31%). The combined outcome rate (overall death, hospitalization for heart failure or re-replacement of the valve) was 54%. Among the 13 patients without PPM, 31% were in functional class II-III, there were no hospitalizations for heart failure and only 4 patients had died from cardiac causes. Combined outcome rate was 23%. Conclusions: PPM was a marker of poorer clinical results on a long term follow up of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. Inferential statistical analysis was not performed due to the relatively low number of patients included.

Long-term mortality predictors in patients with small aortic annulus undergoing aortic valve replacement with a 19- or 21-mm bioprosthesis

Abstract Introduction: Replacement of the aortic valve in patients with a small aortic annulus is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A prosthesis-patient mismatch is one of the main problems associated with failed valves in this patient population. Objective: To evaluate the long-term mortality predictors in patients with a small aortic annulus undergoing aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthesis. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, a total of 101 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement from January 2000 to December 2010 were studied. There were 81 (80.19%) women with a mean age of 52.81±18.4 years. Severe aortic stenosis was the main indication for surgery in 54 (53.4%) patients. Posterior annulus enlargement was performed in 16 (15.8%) patients. Overall, 54 (53.41%) patients underwent concomitant surgery: 28 (27.5%) underwent mitral valve replacement, and 13 (12.7%) underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Results: Mean valve index was 0.82±0.08 cm2/m2. Overall, 17 (16.83%) patients had a valve index lower than 0.75 cm2/m2, without statistical significance for mortality (P=0.12). The overall 10-year survival rate was 83.17%. The rate for patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement was 91.3% and 73.1% (P=0.02) for patients who underwent concomitant surgery. In the univariate analysis, the main predictors of mortality were preoperative ejection fraction (P=0.02; HR 0.01) and EuroSCORE II results (P=0.00000042; HR 1.13). In the multivariate analysis, the main predictors of mortality were age (P=0.01, HR 1.04) and concomitant surgery (P=0.01, HR 5.04). Those relationships were statistically significant. Conclusion: A valve index of < 0.75 cm2/m2 did not affect 10-year survival. However, concomitant surgery and age significantly affected mortality.

EuroSCORE II and STS as mortality predictors in patients undergoing TAVI / EuroSCORE II e STS como preditores de mortalidade em pacientes submetidos ao TAVI

SUMMARY Introduction: the EuroSCORE II and STS are the most used scores for surgical risk stratification and indication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, its role as a tool for mortality prediction in patients undergoing TAVI is still unclear. Objective: to evaluate the performance of the EuroSCORE II and STS as predictors of in-hospital and 30-day mortality in patients undergoing TAVI. Methods: we included 59 symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis that underwent TAVI between 2010 and 2014. The variables were analyzed using Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test and the discriminative power was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) with a 95% confidence interval. Results: mean age was 81±7.3 years, 42.3% men. The mean EuroSCORE II was 7.6±7.3 % and STS was 20.7±10.3%. Transfemoral procedure was performed in 88.13%, transapical in 3.38% and transaortic in 8.47%. In-hospital mortality was 10.1% and 30-day mortality was 13.5%. Patients who died had EuroSCORE II and STS higher than the survivors (33.7±16.7vs. 18.6±7.3% p=0,0001 for STS and 13.9±16.1 vs. 4.8±3.8% p=0.0007 for EuroSCORE II). The STS showed an AUC of 0.81 and the EuroSCORE II of 0.77 and there were no differences in the discrimination ability using ROC curves (p=0.72). Conclusion: in this cohort, the STS and EuroSCORE II were predictors of in-hospital and 30-days mortality in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI.

RESUMO Introdução: STS e EuroSCORE II são os escores mais utilizados para a estratificação de risco cirúrgico e indicação do implante de válvula aórtica transcateter (TAVI). Entretanto, seu papel como ferramenta para predição de mortalidade em pacientes submetidos ao TAVI ainda é incerto. Objetivo: avaliar o desempenho do EuroSCORE II e STS como preditores de mortalidade intra-hospitalar em 30 dias em pacientes submetidos ao TAVI. Métodos: 59 pacientes com estenose aórtica importante submetidos ao TAVI entre 2010 e 2014. Variáveis foram analisadas por meio do teste t-Student e teste exato de Fisher, e o poder discriminativo foi avaliado pela curva ROC e área sob a curva, acompanhada de intervalo de confiança de 95%. Resultados: a idade média foi de 81±7,3 anos, 42,3% homens. Média do EuroSCORE II foi de 6,07±7,3%, e do STS, 20,7±10,3%. Procedimento transfemoral foi realizado em 88,13%, transapical, em 3,38% e transaórtico, em 8,47%. A mortalidade intra-hospitalar foi 10,1%, e em 30 dias, 13,5%. Os pacientes que evoluíram para óbito apresentavam STS e EuroSCORE II mais elevados que os sobreviventes (33,7±16,7% vs. 18,6±7,3%; p=0,0001 para STS e 13,9±16,1% vs. 4,8±3,8%; p=0,0007 para EuroSCORE II). O STS apresentou AUC de 0,81, e o EuroSCORE II, 0,77. Não houve diferença na capacidade de discriminação pelas curvas ROC (p=0,72). Conclusão: STS e EuroSCORE II foram preditores de mortalidade intra-hospitalar em 30 dias.

Desempenho de Escores de Risco Cirúrgico para Prever Mortalidade após Implante Transcateter de Valva Aórtica / Performance of Surgical Risk Scores to Predict Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

AbstractBackground:Predicting mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains a challenge.Objectives:To evaluate the performance of 5 risk scores for cardiac surgery in predicting the 30-day mortality among patients of the Brazilian Registry of TAVI.Methods:The Brazilian Multicenter Registry prospectively enrolled 418 patients undergoing TAVI in 18 centers between 2008 and 2013. The 30-day mortality risk was calculated using the following surgical scores: the logistic EuroSCORE I (ESI), EuroSCORE II (ESII), Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score, Ambler score (AS) and Guaragna score (GS). The performance of the risk scores was evaluated in terms of their calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow test) and discrimination [area under the receiver–operating characteristic curve (AUC)].Results:The mean age was 81.5 ± 7.7 years. The CoreValve (Medtronic) was used in 86.1% of the cohort, and the transfemoral approach was used in 96.2%. The observed 30-day mortality was 9.1%. The 30-day mortality predicted by the scores was as follows: ESI, 20.2 ± 13.8%; ESII, 6.5 ± 13.8%; STS score, 14.7 ± 4.4%; AS, 7.0 ± 3.8%; GS, 17.3 ± 10.8%. Using AUC, none of the tested scores could accurately predict the 30-day mortality. AUC for the scores was as follows: 0.58 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49 to 0.68, p = 0.09] for ESI; 0.54 (95% CI: 0.44 to 0.64, p = 0.42) for ESII; 0.57 (95% CI: 0.47 to 0.67, p = 0.16) for AS; 0.48 (95% IC: 0.38 to 0.57, p = 0.68) for STS score; and 0.52 (95% CI: 0.42 to 0.62, p = 0.64) for GS. The Hosmer–Lemeshow test indicated acceptable calibration for all scores (p > 0.05).Conclusions:In this real world Brazilian registry, the surgical risk scores were inaccurate in predicting mortality after TAVI. Risk models specifically developed for TAVI are required.

ResumoFundamento:Ainda é desafiador prever a mortalidade de pacientes que se submetem ao TAVI (sigla do inglês Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation).Objetivos:Avaliar o desempenho de cinco escores de risco para cirurgia cardíaca em prever mortalidade em 30 dias de pacientes inscritos no Registro Brasileiro de TAVI.Métodos:O Registro Multicêntrico Brasileiro inscreveu prospectivamente 418 pacientes submetidos ao TAVI em 18 centros entre 2008 e 2013. Os seguintes escores cirúrgicos foram usados para calcular o risco de mortalidade no período de 30 dias: EuroSCORE I (ESI) logístico, EuroSCORE II (ESII), STS Score (STS), Ambler Score (AS) e Guaragna Score (GS). O desempenho dos escores de risco foram avaliados através de sua calibração (teste Hosmer-Lemeshow) e discriminação [área sob a curva (AUC) do inglês receiver-operating characteristic curve)].Resultados:A idade média foi de 81,5 ± 7,7 anos. A prótese aórtica CoreValve (Medtronic) foi usada em 86,1% da coorte e a abordagem transfemural usada em 96,2%. A mortalidade observada no período de 30 dias foi de 9,1%. A mortalidade no período de 30 dias prevista pelos escores foi: ESI, 20,2 ± 13,8%; ESII, 6,5 ± 13,8%; STS, 14,7 ± 4,4%; AS, 7,0 ± 3,8%; GS, 17,3 ± 10,8%. Nenhum dos escores testados com a AUC foi capaz de prever a mortalidade no período de 30 dias de forma precisa. As AUC para os escores foram: 0,58 [95% de intervalo de confiança (IC): 0,49 a 0,68, p = 0,09] para ESI; 0,54 (IC de 95%: 0,44 a 0,64, p = 0,42) para ESII; 0,57 (IC de 95%: 0,47 a 0,67, p = 0,16) para AS; 0,48 (IC de 95%: 0,38 a 0,57, p = 0,68) para STS e 0,52 (IC de 95%: 0,42 a 0,62, p = 0,64) para GS. O teste Hosmer-Lemeshow indicou uma calibração aceitável para todos os escores (p > 0,05).Conclusões:Neste registro brasileiro de mundo real, os escores de risco cirúrgico foram imprecisos para prever a mortalidade após o TAVI. São necessários modelos de risco desenvolvidos especificamente para o TAVI.

Costo-efectividad de reemplazo valvular aórtico percutáneo vs terapia conservadora en la estenosis aórtica de muy alto riesgo en un centro terciario chileno / Cost-effectiveness of trans aortic valve replacement vs. conservative treatment in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis in a referral hospital center in Santiago, Chile

Introducción: El objetivo fue evaluar la costo-efectividad del reemplazo valvular aórtico percutáneo (RVAP) contra terapia conservadora (TC) en pacientes con estenosis aórtica (EA) severa de muy alto riesgo, en un centro de derivación. Métodos: Los pacientes derivados entre Enero 2013 y Septiembre 2014, considerados de muy alto riesgo y candidatos a RVAP fueron incluidos. El costo de los recursos usados, de las readmisiones y la sobrevida fueron obtenidos para determinar el tiempo de vida ganado y la relación incremental de costo-efectividad (RICE) del RVAP Resultados: El grupo estudiado quedó compuesto por 39 pacientes, con edad promedio 82±7 años, más frecuentemente mujeres (74.4%), con elevado perfil de riesgo (STS score 11.4±5.6). Diecisiete pacientes (43.6%) fueron sometidos a RVAP y 22 (56.4%) a TC. Durante el seguimiento se registraron 25 rehospitalizaciones en el grupo de TC, a un costo promedio de $4.195.073 por paciente (7,027 dólares). Todos los pacientes sometidos a RAVP recibieron con éxito una prótesis Sapien XT y fueron egresados vivos. El costo promedio estimado del RVAP fue $20.000.000 (33,500 dólares). La sobrevida media fue de 54.5% (10 eventos) en grupo TC contra 94.1% (una muerte) en el grupo RVAP [285±204 días/seguimiento] (p<0.001). Así se pudo estimar que RVAP se asoció a un incremento de vida de al menos un año, lo cual resultó en una RICE de 26,470 dólares/año de vida ganado. Conclusión: El RAVP resultó costo-efectivo comparado con la TC en pacientes portadores de EA severa de muy alto riego tratados en la realidad de un centro de derivación nacional.

Aim: to evaluate cost-effectiveness of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) compared to conservative treatment in patients with very high risk severe aortic stenosis (AS) referred to a tertiary center in Santiago, Chile Methods: Patients with high surgical risk and severe AS referred between January 2013 and September 2014 were included. Cost of resources, readdmissions, life-years gained and incremental cost-effectiveness of TAVI were calculated Results: Thirty-nine patients were finally included. Mean age was 82±7 years old, more commonly women (74%) with a mean STS score of 11.4±5.6 that confirmed their high-risk. Seventeen patients (43.6%) had TAVR and 22 (56.4%) underwent conventional medical therapy. All patients in the TAVR group - treated with Sapien XT® device - survived the procedure and were discharged alive. Mean cost of the procedure was approximately US$ 33,500. After a mean follow-up period of 285±204 days, mean survival rate in the control group was 54.5% (10 deaths) as compared to 94.1% in the TAVR group (1 death, p<0.001). Therefore, a gain of al least one year was obtained with TAVR resulting in an incremental cost effectiveness of US$ 26.470 per year of life gained. Conclusion: TAVR resulted costly-effective compared to conventional therapy in patients with severe AS and high surgical risk in a Chilean referral center.

Experiência Inicial de Dois Centros Nacionais no Implante de Prótese Aórtica Transcateter / Initial Experience of Two National Centers in Transcatheter Aortic Prosthesis Implantation

Fundamento: O implante de prótese aórtica transcateter é uma alternativa efetiva para o tratamento cirúrgico para a correção de estenose aórtica grave em pacientes inoperáveis ou de alto risco cirúrgico. Objetivos: Apresentar os resultados clínicos e ecocardiográficos imediatos e no médio prazo da experiência inicial do implante de prótese aórtica transcateter. Métodos: Entre junho de 2009 e fevereiro de 2013, 112 pacientes foram submetidos a implante de prótese aórtica transcateter. Resultados: A idade média foi 82,5 ± 6,5 anos e o Euro SCORE logístico foi 23,6 ± 13,5. O sucesso do procedimento foi de 84%. Após o implante, houve queda do gradiente sistólico médio (pré = 54,7 ± 15,3 mmHg vs. pós = 11,7 ± 4,0 mmHg; p < 0,01). Acidente vascular cerebral ocorreu em 3,6% dos pacientes, complicações vasculares em 19%, e foi necessário o implante de marca-passo definitivo em 13% dos pacientes nos primeiros 30 dias pós-implante. A mortalidade aos 30 dias e no seguimento médio de 16 ± 11 meses foi, respectivamente, de 14 e de 8,9%. A presença de doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica foi o único preditor de mortalidade em 30 dias e no seguimento. A área valvar aórtica e o gradiente sistólico médio não apresentaram variações significativas durante o seguimento. Conclusões: O implante de prótese aórtica transcateter é um procedimento eficaz e seguro para o tratamento da estenose aórtica em pacientes de alto risco cirúrgico ou inoperáveis. A presença de doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica foi o único preditor independente de mortalidade identificado, tanto no primeiro mês pós-intervenção quanto no seguimento mais tardio. .

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is an effective alternative to surgical treatment of severe aortic stenosis in patients who are inoperable or at high surgical risk. Objectives: To report the immediate and follow-up clinical and echocardiographic results of the initial experience of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Methods: From 2009 June to 2013 February, 112 patients underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Results: Mean age was 82.5 ± 6.5 years, and the logistic EuroSCORE was 23.6 ± 13.5. Procedural success was 84%. After the intervention, a reduction in the mean systolic gradient was observed (pre: 54.7 ± 15.3 vs. post: 11.7 ± 4.0 mmHg; p < 0.01). Cerebrovascular accidents occurred in 3.6%, vascular complications in 19% and permanent pacemaker was required by 13% of the patients. Thirty-day mortality and at follow-up of 16 ± 11 months was 14% and 8.9% respectively. The presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was the only predictor of mortality at 30 days and at follow-up. During follow up, aortic valve area and mean systolic gradient did not change significantly. Conclusions: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of aortic stenosis in high-surgical risk or inoperable patients. The presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was the only independent predictor of mortality identified both in the first month post-intervention and at follow-up. .

Idade avançada e incidência de fibrilação atrial em pós-operatório de troca valvar aórtica / Advanced age and incidence of atrial fibrillation in the postoperative period of aortic valve replacement

Objetivo: Descrever, em idosos, a correlação entre faixa etária e ocorrência de fibrilação atrial após cirurgia por estenose aórtica, além de avaliar a influência da ocorrência de fibrilação atrial na incidência de acidente vascular cerebral, tempo de internação e mortalidade hospitalar. Métodos: Estudo transversal retrospectivo incluindo pacientes com idade > 70 anos submetidos à cirurgia de troca valvar aórtica isolada. Resultados: Foram estudados 348 pacientes com idade média de 76,8±4,6 anos. A incidência de fibrilação atrial no pós-operatório foi 32,8% (n=114), sendo superior nos pacientes > 80 anos (42,9 vs. 28,8% 70-79 anos, P=0,017) e havendo significância estatística limítrofe (P=0,055) para tendência linear na correlação idade e incidência de fibrilação atrial. Verificou-se significativo maior tempo de internação na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva e hospitalar total, porém, não se observou maior taxa de acidente vascular cerebral ou de mortalidade hospitalar decorrente da fibrilação atrial. Conclusão: A incidência de fibrilação atrial no pós-operatório de cirurgia para estenose valvar aórtica em pacientes idosos com > 70 anos foi elevada e linearmente correlacionada ao avanço da idade, especialmente após 80 anos, causando aumento dos tempos de internação total e em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva, sem aumento significativo da morbimortalidade. O conhecimento desses dados é importante para evidenciar a necessidade de medidas profiláticas e de tratamento precoce dessa arritmia nesse subgrupo. .

Objective: This study aims to describe the correlation between age and occurrence of atrial fibrillation after aortic stenosis surgery in the elderly as well as evaluate the influence of atrial fibrillation on the incidence of strokes, hospital length of stay, and hospital mortality. Methods: Cross-sectional retrospective study of > 70 year-old patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement. Results: 348 patients were included in the study (mean age 76.8±4.6 years). Overall, post-operative atrial fibrillation was 32.8% (n=114), but it was higher in patients aged 80 years and older (42.9% versus 28.8% in patients aged 70-79 years, P=0.017). There was borderline significance for linear correlation between age and atrial fibrillation (P=0.055). Intensive Care Unit and hospital lengths of stay were significantly increased in atrial fibrillation (P<0.001), but there was no increase in mortality or stroke associated with atrial fibrillation. Conclusion: Post-operative atrial fibrillation incidence in aortic valve replacement is high and correlates with age in patients aged 70 years and older and significantly more pronounced in patients aged 80 years. There was increased length of stay at Intensive Care Unit and hospital, but there was no increase in mortality or stroke. These data are important for planning prophylaxis and early treatment for this subgroup. .

Manejo anestésico en una paciente portadora de estenosis aórtica crítica sometida a cesárea de urgencia. Reporte de un caso clínico / Anesthetic management in a patient with critical aortic stenosis emergency cesarean section. Report of a case

Presentamos el caso de una paciente de 42 años, portadora de válvula mecánica mitral y aórtica, que cursando el tercer trimestre de gestación sufre una disfunción crítica de la prótesis aórtica. Es asistida por el servicio de anestesiología del Hospitalde Clínicas, en este contexto para realizar una cesárea de urgencia. Se analiza en este trabajo el manejo anestesiológico de la gestante con una estenosis aórtica severa por trombosis valvular, sometida a una cirugía cesárea de urgencia. Se realiza una revisión que contempla la técnica anestésica a realizar comparando la anestesia regional versus anestesia general; consideraciones en las técnicas de bloqueo central en pacientes en tratamiento con antifibrinolíticos y antiacoagulantes; monitorización a realizar; relevancia del ecocardiograma transtorácico en el perioperatorio, como otro monitor fundamental para evaluar estado hemodinámico de la paciente; elección de drogas anestésicas que nos brindan mayor seguridad en este tipo de pacientes, con la menor repercusión sobre el feto y su evolución post operatoria. Conclusiones: El manejo anestesiológico de gestantes portadoras de estenosis aórtica crítica sometida a cirugía cesárea es un desafío. La creación de un equipo multidisciplinario, la posibilidad de contar con la monitorización adecuada, y el uso de fármacos que permiten mantener la hemodinamia materna con escasa repercusión sobre el feto permitieron llegar a un resultado exitoso en este caso...

Características clínico quirúrgicas en pacientes mayores de 60 años post operados de reemplazo de válvula aórtica en el Hospital Nacional Dos de Mayo (2000-2010) / Surgical clinical characteristics in patients over 60 years post operated for aortic valve replacement at the National Hospital Dos de Mayo (2000-2010)

Objetivo: Describir las características clínico quirúrgicas en pacientes mayores de 60 años post operados de reemplazo de válvula aórtica. Materiales y Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo en pacientes intervenidos en el Hospital Dos de Mayo durante los meses entre enero 2000 y diciembre 2010. Introducción y objetivos: Los factores más importantes asociados a la mortalidad temprana en el recambio valvular aórtico del anciano son controvertidos. Realizamos un análisis de riesgo en estos pacientes. Pacientes y método: Se realizó un análisis uni y multivariante de los principales factores asociados a la mortalidad hospitalaria en 38 pacientes mayores de 60 años intervenidos de recambio valvular aórtico, entre enero 2000 y diciembre 2010 y el poder discriminante del modelo predictivo se evaluó mediante curvas ROC. Resultados: Los factores relacionados en el preoperatorio con mayor mortalidad en el análisis univariante fueron: Euroscore: riesgo medio (3-5) (p<0,002528), Cineangiografia con lesiones (p<0,000024), Dislipidemia (p<0,004691), diabetes mellitus (p<0,004279), Hipertensión arterial (p<0,025431), Fibrilación auricular (p<0,000146), y en las complicaciones postoperatorias son: bajo gasto cardiaco (p<0,000962), reoperación por sangrado (p<0,000962), ventilación mecánica >de 24 horas (p<0,098174), Fibrilación auricular (p<0,024698), Insuficiencia renal aguda (p<0,000962), Falla cardiaca congestiva (p<0,000921), complicaciones pulmonares (p<0,025643). La mortalidad estimada por el modelo predictivo fue del 2,19 por ciento, y superior a la calculada mediante el EuroSCORE a la mortalidad observada (7,69 por ciento) (con área bajo la curva ROC de 0,719). Conclusiones: Los factores asociados a una mayor mortalidad en el recambio valvular aórtico en pacientes ancianos son en el preoperatorio: el Euroscore medio, cineangiografia con lesiones, dislipidemia, diabetes mellitus, hipertensión arterial, fibrilación auricular, la existencia de complicaciones en el...

Objective: To describe the clinical surgical patients over 60 years post surgery for aortic valve replacement. Materials and Methods: A descriptive study of patients treated in the Hospital Dos de Mayo during the months between January 2000 and December 2010. Patients and methods: We performed univariate and multivariate analysis of the main factors associated with hospital mortality in 38 patients older than 60 years who underwent aortic valve replacement between January 2000 and December 2010 and the discriminating power of the predictive model was assessed using ROC curves. Results: Factors associated with increased mortality in the univariate analysis were: Euroscore: medium risk (3-5) (p<0.002528), cineangiography lesions (p<0.000024), dyslipidemia (p<0.004691), diabetes mellitus (p<0.004279), hypertension (p<0.025431), atrial fibrillation (p<0.000146), low cardiac output (p<0.000962), reoperation for bleeding (p<0.000962), mechanical ventilation > 24 hours (p<0.098174), atrial fibrillation (p<0.024698), acute renal failure (p<0.000962), congestive heart failure (p<0.000921), pulmonary complications (p<0.025643). Estimated mortality predictive model was 2.19 per cent, and higher than that ca1culated by EuroSCORE for mortality (7.69 per cent) (area under the ROC curve of 0.719). Conclusions: Factors associated with increased mortality in aortic valve replacement in elderly patients in the preoperative period are: the mean EuroSCORE, cineangiography with injuries, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, the presence of postoperative complications such as: low cardiac output, reoperation for bleeding, mechanical ventilation> 24 hours, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, acute renal failure, pulmonary complications. The predictive model based on the EuroSCORE has high discriminative power in our patients. Sex, prosthesis size and pump time have no direct influence on mortality.

Valvuloplastia aórtica por cateter balão na estenose aórtica degenerativa: impacto terapêutico em pacientes em condição clínica in extremis / Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in degenerative aortic stenosis: therapeutic impact on patients in extremis

INTRODUÇÃO: A valvuloplastia aórtica por cateter balão (VAB) é utilizada como estratégia paliativa em pacientes inelegíveis tanto para troca valvar cirúrgica quanto para implante valvar aórtico transcateter, ou como ponte para essas modalidades de tratamento. Não se sabe o impacto terapêutico da VAB quando realizada como medida de salvamento para pacientes em condições clínicas extremas (in extremis). MÉTODOS: Foram analisados pacientes com estenose aórtica grave de etiologia degenerativa submetidos à VAB entre julho de 2008 e janeiro de 2013. Os pacientes foram divididos entre o grupo in extremis (definido pela presença de duas ou mais das seguintes disfunções orgânicas: ventilação mecânica, instabilidade hemodinâmica, terapia renal dialítica, coagulopatia ou disfunção hepática graves) e o grupo controle, que incluiu os demais pacientes. RESULTADOS: Um total de 19 pacientes realizaram VAB no período. A condição clínica in extremis esteve presente em 42,1%. Os pacientes do grupo in extremis tiveram EUROSCORE II mais elevado (41,1 ± 24,7 vs. 15,9 ± 14,0; P = 0,01) e fração de ejeção do VE mais baixa que o grupo controle (33,9 ± 17,3% vs. 49,0 ± 12,5%; P = 0,04). Nenhum paciente do grupo in extremis sobreviveu ao período intra-hospitalar, enquanto que, no grupo controle, a mortalidade foi de 27,3% (P < 0,01). CONCLUSÕES: Para o tratamento de pacientes com estenose aórtica grave de etiologia degenerativa, a VAB tem resultado desfavorável quando indicada para pacientes com duas ou mais disfunções orgânicas, ou seja, em condição clínica in extremis.

BACKGROUND: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is used as a palliative strategy in patients who are not eligible for valve replacement surgery, transcatheter aortic valve implantation, or as a bridge to these treatment modalities. The impact of BAV as a salvage procedure for patients in extreme clinical conditions (in extremis) is unknown. METHODS: Patients with severe degenerative aortic stenosis undergoing BAV between July 2008 and January 2013 were evaluated. Patients were divided into the in-extremis group (defined by the presence of two or more of the following organ dysfunctions: mechanical ventilation, hemodynamic instability, dialysis, coagulopathy or severe hepatic dysfunction) and the control group, which included the remaining patients. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients underwent BAV. The clinical condition in-extremis was present in 42.1% of them. Patients from the in-extremis group had a higher EUROSCORE II (41.1 ± 24.7 vs. 15.9 ± 14.0; P = 0.001) and LV ejection fraction lower than the control group (33.9 ± 17.3% vs. 49.0 ± 12.5; P = 0.04). None of the patients in the in-extremis group survived past the hospitalization period, whereas the control group mortality was 27.3% (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: BAV has an unfavorable result in patients with severe degenerative aortic stenosis with two or more organ dysfunctions, that is, patients in extremis.

Implante valve-in-valve transcateter em posição aórtica: uma mudança de seleção? / Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation: a selection change?

INTRODUÇÃO: A reoperação para substituição de biopróteses aórticas com disfunção é procedimento que envolve considerável risco. Em alguns casos, a mortalidade é elevada e pode contraindicar o procedimento. O implante minimamente invasivo "valve-in-valve" transcateter de valva aórtica parece ser uma alternativa, reduzindo morbimortalidade. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar esses implantes utilizando a prótese Braile Inovare. MÉTODOS: A prótese Braile Inovare, transcateter, balão expansível foi utilizada em 14 casos. Euroscore médio foi de 42,9%. Todos os pacientes eram portadores de dupla disfunção de bioprótese aórtica. Os procedimentos foram realizados em ambiente cirúrgico híbrido, sob controle ecocardiográfico e fluoroscópico. Por meio de minitoracotomia esquerda, as próteses foram implantadas através do ápice ventricular, sob estimulação ventricular de alta frequência. Foram realizados controles clínicos e ecocardiográficos seriados. O seguimento variou de 1 a 30 meses. RESULTADOS: A correta liberação protética foi possível em todos os casos. Não ocorreu conversão. Não houve mortalidade operatória. A mortalidade em 30 dias foi de 14,3% (dois casos). A fração de ejeção apresentou aumento significativo após o 7º pós-operatório e o gradiente aórtico apresentou redução significativa. A insuficiência aórtica residual não esteve presente. Não ocorreu complicação vascular periférica ou bloqueio atrioventricular total. CONCLUSÕES: O implante "valve-in-valve" de valva aórtica transcateter em biopróteses com disfunção é um procedimento seguro e com morbimortalidade baixa. Essa possibilidade poderá alterar a indicação de seleção de prótese no procedimento inicial, favorecendo próteses biológicas.

OBJECTIVE: Aortic valve replacement for bioprosthesis dysfunction is a procedure involving considerable risk. In some cases, mortality is high and may contraindicate the procedure. Minimally invasive transcatheter aortic "valve-in-valve" implant appears to be an alternative, reducing morbidity and mortality. The objective is to evaluate aortic valve-in-valve procedure using Braile Inovare prosthesis. METHODS: The Braile Inovare prosthesis, transcatheter, expandable balloon, was used in 14 cases. Average EuroSCORE was 42.9%. All patients had double aortic bioprosthesis dysfunction. Procedures were performed in a surgical hybrid environment under echocardiographic and fluoroscopic guidance. Using left minithoracotomy prostheses were implanted through the ventricular apex under high-frequency ventricular pacing. Serial clinical and echocardiographic controls were performed. Follow-up ranged 1-30 months. RESULTS: Correct prosthetic deployment was obtained in all cases. There was no conversion. There was no operative mortality. The 30-day mortality was 14.3% (two cases). Ejection fraction increased significantly after the 7th postoperative day. Aortic gradient significantly reduced. The residual aortic regurgitation was not present. There were no vascular complications or complete atrioventricular block. CONCLUSION: The transcatheter "valve-in-valve" procedure for bioprosthesis dysfunction is safe with low morbidity. This possibility may change prosthesis choice during the first aortic valve replacement, favoring bioprostheses.

Resultados da cirurgia por estenose aórtica em pacientes acima de 75 anos, em 4,5 anos de seguimento / Results of aortic valve surgery in patients over 75 years old, at 4.5 years of follow-up

INTRODUÇÃO: O aumento da expectativa de vida da população tem levado à maior necessidade de intervenções cirúrgicas sobre a valva aórtica. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar a mortalidade precoce e a médio prazo, a necessidade de reoperação para troca valvar e complicações valvares [tromboembolismo sistêmico (TES) e endocardite infecciosa em prótese (EI)] em pacientes acima de 75 anos submetidos a cirurgia de estenose aórtica. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo de 230 casos, operados no período de 2002 a 2007. A idade média foi de 83,4 anos, sendo 53% do sexo masculino, 73,2% hipertensos, 17,9% portadores de fibrilação atrial e 14,4% com cirurgia cardíaca prévia. Outro procedimento cardíaco esteve associado em 39,1% dos casos. RESULTADOS: Em 4,51 anos de seguimento médio, a sobrevida geral foi de 57,4%. Ocorreram 13,9% óbitos intra-hospitalares (9,4% no grupo cirurgia de estenose aórtica isolada vs. 20,9% quando outro procedimento cirúrgico foi associado) e 28,7% óbitos após a alta hospitalar (25,0% vs. 34,4%), com 34 destes por causas cardiovasculares. Ocorreram seis casos de EI, oito casos de TES e seis reoperações para troca valvar. Os preditores de mortalidade geral foram: tempo de isquemia >90 min (RC 1,99 IC 95% 1,06-3,74), fração de ejeção <60% (RC 1,76 IC 95% 1,10-2,81) e acidente vascular encefálico prévio (RC 2,43 IC 95% 1,18-5,30). CONCLUSÃO: Ainda que o risco cirúrgico imediato de idosos seja elevado, as taxas de sobrevida referentes ao tratamento cirúrgico em pacientes acima de 75 anos são aceitáveis e permitem essa intervenção. O prognóstico é agravado, sobretudo, pela associação com doença arterial coronariana.

BACKGROUND: The increased longevity elevated the frequency of elderly requiring surgery, among them the correction of aortic stenosis. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate medium-term mortality, need for reoperation for valve replacement and valve complications [systemic thromboembolism (STE) and prosthetic endocarditis (PE)] in patients over 75 years old who had undergone surgery for aortic stenosis. METHODS: Retrospective study of 230 patients from 2002 to 2007. Mean age was 83.4 years and 53% were male. The prevalence of hypertension was 73.2%, atrial fibrillation 17.9% and previous cardiac surgery 14.4%. Another cardiac procedure was associated in 39.1%. RESULTS: In a mean follow-up of 4.51 years the overall survival of the population studied was 57.4%. Death in the immediate postoperative period occurred in 13.9% (9.4% in the isolated aortic stenosis surgery group vs. 20.9% when another procedure was associated). Deaths in the medium term occurred in 28.7% of the patients (25.0% vs. 34.4%), with 34 of these because of cardiovascular causes. There were 6 cases of PE, 8 cases of STE and 6 reoperations. The predictors of mortality were ischemia time >90 min (OR 1.99 95% CI 1.06-3.74), ejection fraction <60% (OR 1.76 95% CI 1.10-2.81) and prior stroke (OR 2.43 95% CI 1.18-5.30). CONCLUSION: Although the immediate surgical risk of the elderly is high, survival rates for surgical treatment of patients over 75 years old are acceptable and allow this intervention. The prognosis is worse especially because of the association with coronary artery disease.

Escores de risco nas intervenções em valvopatia / Risk scores in valvular heart disease interventions

Os escores de risco utilizados assistencialmente em clínica de valvopatia já apresentam validações em todo mundo, entretanto, os dados não são homogêneos. As características epidemiológicas de cada população requerem uma validação local dessas ferramentas de risco. A troca valvar percutânea, que já é uma realidade em doença valvar (principalmente na estenose aórtica), está indicada em pacientes com risco cirúrgico elevado ou considerado proibitivo. Os estudos com essa nova estratégia de tratamento utilizam os escores de risco como um dos critérios de inclusão e são escassos trabalhos que utilizam tais ferramentas como preditoras de risco. Os escores de risco depois de validados em suas respectivas populações vieram para somar com a prática clínica (individualização da conduta) na definição da conduta em clínica de valvopatia.

The risk scores used as assistance agents in valve diseases are validated worldwide; however, the data are not homogeneous. The epidemiological characteristics of each population require local validation of these risk tools. The percutaneous valve replacement, which is a reality in valvular diseases (especially aortic stenosis), is indicated for patients with high or prohibitive surgical risk. Studies with this new treatment strategy use risk scores as criteria for inclusion and there are few studies that use such tools as predictors of risk. The risk scores, after due validation in their relevant populations, are combined with clinical practice (individualization of conduct) in the definition of the conduct to be adopted in the clinical practice of valvular heart disease.

Resultados imediatos e seguimento clínico dos pacientes submetidos a implante valvar aórtico transcateter / Immediate results and clinical follow-up of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic-valve implantation

INTRODUÇÃO: Um terço da população idosa portadora de estenose aórtica calcificada sintomática não apresenta condições cirúrgicas em decorrência do elevado risco operatório. O implante valvar aórtico transcateter (IVAT) surgiu como uma alternativa terapêutica para esses pacientes. MÉTODOS: Incluímos, no período de novembro de 2008 a abril de 2012, todos os pacientes submetidos a IVAT em nosso serviço. Relatamos as características clínicas basais, os dados dos procedimentos, os resultados hospitalares e o seguimento clínico dessa população. As definições utilizadas foram baseadas nos critérios do Valve Academic Research Consortium. RESULTADOS: O IVAT foi realizado em 23 pacientes, com 79 ± 6,7 anos de idade, 56% do sexo feminino. O EuroSCORE foi de 20,4 ± 11,1%. A prótese CoreValve® foi utilizada em 19 pacientes (82,6%) e a Edwards SAPIEN TM nos demais. A taxa de sucesso do procedimento foi de 96%. O tempo médio de seguimento clínico foi de 22 ± 12,8 meses, observando-se 6 óbitos (26,1%) nesse período, 3 dos quais ocorreram nos primeiros 30 dias (13%) e outros 2 (21,7%), até o final do primeiro ano. Um paciente apresentou ataque isquêmico transitório na fase hospitalar (4,3%), mas não ocorreram episódios de acidente vascular encefálico ou de infarto do miocárdio no período periprocedimento ou no acompanhamento tardio. O desfecho combinado de segurança aos 30 dias ocorreu em 5 pacientes (21,7%) e o desfecho combinado de eficácia aos 12 meses foi de 78,3%. CONCLUSÕES: Os resultados obtidos neste estudo demonstram o IVAT como procedimento atrativo para o tratamento de pacientes portadores de estenose aórtica calcificada de alto risco cirúrgico.

BACKGROUND: One third of the elderly population with symptomatic calcified aortic stenosis cannot undergo surgery due to their high operative risk. The transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as an alternative therapy for this group of patients. METHODS: All patients submitted to TAVI from November 2008 to April 2012 were included in our study. We report the baseline clinical characteristics, procedural data, hospital outcomes and clinical follow-up of this population. Definitions were based on the Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria. RESULTS: TAVI was performed in 23 patients, with 79 ± 6.7 years of age, and 56% were female. The EuroSCORE was 20.4 ± 11.1%. The CoreValve® prosthesis was used in 19 patients (82.6%) and the Edwards SAPIEN TM valve was used in the remaining ones. Procedure success rate was 96%. The mean follow-up was 22 ± 12.8 months, with 6 deaths (26.1%) in this period, 3 of which were observed in the first 30 days (13%) and other 2 (21.7%) by the end of the first year. One patient had a transient ischemic attack during hospitalization (4.3%), but there were no episodes of stroke or myocardial infarction in the periprocedural period or in the follow-up. The composite safety endpoint at 30 days was observed in 5 patients (21.7%) and the composite efficacy endpoint at 12 months was 78.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that TAVI is an attractive procedure for the treatment of patients with calcified aortic stenosis and high operative risk.